Lisa Wu-Hartwell: Changing Faces??

lisawu

According to Wikipedia, Lisa Wu-Hartwell has more aliases than Jennifer Garner! 

 

“Lisa Wu-Hartwell — …She has also gone by the names:  Sharon Millette Wu, Sharon Lisa Sweat, and Lisa Wu-Sweat when she filed chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2007.”

 

It’s funny how Lisa or Sharon or whatever her damn name is plays all holier than thou with the other Atlanta Housewives when SHE is actually the shadiest one of all!   Hollywood and Vine understand that individuals fall into fucked up business situations.  But take your bankruptcy like a real bitch and stop changing your name like you’re in a fucking federal witness protection program.

Don’t forget to follow H&V on Twitter (hollywoodNvine).

In a minute…

14 Responses to “Lisa Wu-Hartwell: Changing Faces??”

  1. You need to stay out of this woman’s business. Sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do! Nobody is perfect…..not even you!!!

  2. @ Stephanie – You’re right, we’re not perfect, obviously. But don’t hate on us for discussing something that was already posted on Wikipedia. Your advice is misplaced and obviously you’re interested in her business, too! We didn’t send this post to you.

  3. I whent to high school with Lisa. Sharon is her sisters name.

  4. lisa muthafuckiin loc Says:

    I Love Lisa… a lot of these females should really look up to her… she is a very strong… by far a great mother anyone can truly have… her family means everything to her and she is very good providing for them… i don’t care how many time she changes her name.. she still the same. her face has not change…. sometimes people fall and do what they do.. thats on them feel me… (haters be all up in the kool-aid)lol you the SHIZZNITZ the haters don’t faded you i already know! keep doing wat you do… and do the damn thing!!

  5. @ lisa loc – Yeah, on a certain level women should look up to Lisa. She handles her business professionally and works hard for what she has, so it seems. All Hollywood and Vine are saying is that Lisa should just keep it real all the time, not just when it suits her! There’s a lot to be said about NeNe who sat up there and spilled her guts about domestic violence in spite of what people might have thought. You NEVER KNOW who you might touch by being truthful!

  6. Lisa...or is it??? Says:

    she put her business on tv…that gives viewers to be ALL UP IN IT!

  7. @Angie – We don’t know her sister’s name, but Lisa goes by Sharon. That’s a fact which is why when Keith Sweat sued her ass, he put her alias, Sharon, on the court documents!

  8. she put her business on tv…that gives viewers to be ALL UP IN IT!

    Hmmm, really.. and what do you gain personally? How is your life enhanced?? Just seems silly to me to think you got someone ’summed up’ by a 8 or 9 episode edited TV show & some online blogs.

  9. Lookout Says:

    It’s so strange that Lisa after the bankruptcy is trying for custody and child support, she makes money disapear like magic. I’ll bet her new cash cow (husband) put the brakes on all that elaborate spending and with no allowances like she had with Sweat, she has to get the cash anyway her poor tail can so I guess it’s back to the Sweat Shop. Lisa cares less about the welfare of those kids, it’s the money and the new child she had was just to make sure she had a “toe hold” on the new bank account. She knows the laws and has spoken many times about the 10 year “what’s yours is mine” marital law. Every man should take note, this is a real devil and not necessarily with a blue dress on LOL. I wonder what hubby is thinking now, at first he thought Sweat was the bad guy and even threatened him about Ms. Lisa, now that he has had time to digest the beast, I just wonder what are is thoughts now about his “China” doll/Ghetto gal. All I got to say is “Bruthas, investigate before you initiate” and “Hesitate before you Participate”

  10. Everyone with common sense knows that Wilkipedia is not valid. It consists of opinions that common folks like yourself leave. It has no history or valid data. Lisa is a great woman for standing up and working everyday, in spite of her struggles and demons. While, pathetic losers lie yourself @ LOL: Hollywood and Vine don’t even have enough credientals to check your sources b4 posting defaming info. Have you ever been to Hollywood? Take a drive down LaCiengna and then check your sources to avoid any legal issues, and REPOST. This is Garbage, and insult, haterism @ its’ finest!!

  11. @Najat – Obviously you’ve never been to Hollywood considering you can’t spell the name of one of the most popular streets out here correctly! Everyone with common sense knows that the same information posted above was included in legal documents when Keith Sweat filed suit against Miss Lisa. Why don’t you do your research? The pathetic one is you – coming on a blog 5 months after the fact trying to insult us when you can’t even spell well enough to pull off a decent insult!

    - Vine

  12. Obviously you need to take a trip to Hooked On Phonics before you try to talk shit and can’t spell shit right. Yeah, of course we’ve been to Hollywood and Vine. If you keep talking we’ll put you out there and make us some more money! Thank you for your continued support!

    - Hollywood

  13. First of all I think she is a pretty girl but I think she is a scam artist. I heard on the radio that she was dating Billionare Arthur Hubbard at the same time as Sheree Whitfield. I also heard that she borrowed 1,500 from Arthur hubbard to pay her husband’s Hummer’s payment. I said to my self talking about pimping your wife out.I think he actually knows about them since it’s has been all over the internet and V-103. Good luck Lisa Wu Hartwell. My advice to you is get help it’s never to late.

  14. @Laura – Interesting. Since we’re not in the ATL, we had no way of hearing that on the radio. At this point, I don’t think she’s a scam artist. I think she’s a hustler! She seems to have her hands in a lot of projects to make sure she has money in her pocket. I’m not knockin’ her hustle…just own who you are and keep it movin’. – Vine

Leave a Reply